Todays verdict concludes a 38day hearing held over four months, the secondlongest oral hearing in history. Supreme court the courts direction came on an appeal filed by the centre against a delhi high court order allowing two persons to file itr for 201819 without linking their aadhaar and pan numbers. The aadhaar card may also be used for the purpose of lpg distribution scheme. Indias supreme court has come down heavily on the mandatory linking of aadhaar for almost everything. The supreme court has upheld section 9aa1 which mandatorily requires quoting of aadhaar for new pan applications as well as for filing of returns. The fivejudge bench had reserved its verdict in the case on may 10, 2018 express photofile the supreme court wednesday ruled that the aadhaar act, 2016, was constitutionally valid. In a landmark decision today the supreme court of india upheld the aadhaar act, the use of the money bill route for its legislative passage and the use of mandatory aadhaar based identification for government welfare schemes, the expenditure for which is drawn from the consolidated fund of india. A 5judge constitutional bench of the supreme court on wednesday upheld the constitutional validity of aadhaar scheme. This section of the aadhaar act provided that private companies could ask consumers for aadhaar details for identification purposes. Supreme court rules aadhaar not mandatory for bank. Sep 26, 2018 supreme court upheld the validity of aadhaar, but imposed some restrictions on its use. What do you think about the supreme court judgement on. Supreme court fivejudge bench headed by chief justice dipak misra gave judgement today that aadhaar is mandatory for linking of pan card and aadhaar.
The majority judgement of the court also read down section 57 of the aadhaar act of 2016, holding that private companies cannot insist on aadhaar numbers from citizens to provide services. Sep 26, 2018 indias supreme court has come down heavily on the mandatory linking of aadhaar for almost everything. Aadhaar linking not mandatory for bank accounts, phones for. The supreme court judgement on aadhaar case which stated that aadhaar will not be mandatory for opening bank accounts might have an impact on aadhaar pay. Sep 26, 2018 this section of the aadhaar act provided that private companies could ask consumers for aadhaar details for identification purposes.
The supreme court is hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the aadhaar scheme on the touchstone of the fundamental right to privacy filed by former karnataka high court judge ks puttuswamy, magsaysay awardee shanta sinha, feminist researcher kalyani sen menon and others. Sep 26, 2018 on september 26, 2018, a constitution bench of the supreme court, led by chief justice of india dipak misra upheld the validity of aadhaar but with riders. Full text of supreme court judgment on aadhaar india news. Sep 26, 2018 the supreme court wednesday declared the centres flagship aadhaar scheme as constitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including its linking with bank accounts, mobile phones.
Full text of supreme court judgment on aadhaar there is a legitimate goal and requirement to have the aadhaar law, the five judge bench led by chief justice of india dipak misra said in its. In its fivebench judgment, the supreme court struck down several irrelevant provisions related to aadhaar card linkage where no benefits, subsidies are involved, especially in the private sector. My reservations should be seen as a difference of opinion not an indictment, rejection or the contempt of the court. The pdf file you want to download will be retrieved from the fastest server. The fivejudge bench led by chief justice of india dipak misra said the scheme gave dignity to the marginalised and served a much larger public interest. The supreme court has delivered its much awaited judgment in the aadhaar case, wherein the majoirty view, comprised of dipak misra cji. These are the key takeaways from the supreme court benchs verdict on the constitutional validity of aadhaar id and the aadhaar act, 2016. The supreme courts aadhaar judgement has clarified the law on the services where the government cannot insist on the aadhaar card.
The supreme court arrived at the following conclusions relating to the validity of the aadhaar card read more. Justice sikri in his majority judgment had held that allowing corporates to seek aadhaar for authentication is unconstitutional. Full text of supreme courts verdict on validity of aadhaar. The supreme court of india also said that aadhaar should be mandatory for welfare schemes and not for services like bank accounts, school admissions and mobile connections. Apr 18, 2020 the supreme court has finally pronounced the judgement on a bunch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of aadhaar as 4. While the fivejudge bench, in the threejudge majority opinion, has effectively. Justice dy chandrachuds dissenting opinion in aadhaar. Todays verdict concludes a 38day hearing held over four months, the secondlongest oral hearing in history after the kesavananda bharati case. The aadhaar judgment is a potential goldmine for those seeking to understand privacy and data protection laws in india. On the supreme court judgement on aadhaar newsclick. Sep 26, 2018 supreme court upholds passing of aadhaar bill as money bill by lok sabha.
Supreme courts judgement on aadhaar may affect aadhaar pay. Judges rule card not mandatory for government subsidies. Jan 26, 2019 i disagree with the judgement but intend to fully honor it. Thats despite an august 2015 supreme court order pdf restraining the. Supreme court upholds constitutional validity of aadhaar. The supreme court has delivered its much awaited judgment in the aadhaar case, wherein the majority view, comprised of dipak misra cji. Aadhaar valid but conditions apply, supreme court decides. First, it does bring an end to one stage of the long legal struggle to ensure that citizens rights and liberties are protected in the midst of technocratic developmental interventions of the government. Honourable supreme court in its landmark judgement has upheld section 9aa of the income tax act as constitutionally valid which required quoting of the aadhaar number in applying for pan as well as for filing of income tax returns.
Sep 26, 2018 aadhaar valid but conditions apply, supreme court rules aadhaar means unique, and its better to be unique than being the best, the supreme court said today. The first petition was filed by former high court judge justice k s puttaswamy in 2012. The judgment authored by justice ak sikri, which has concurrence of chief justice dipak misra and justice am khanwilkar, has read down some of the provisions of the aadhaar. Court said the program is not mandatory for bank accounts, sims. The supreme court judgement on aadhaar case which stated that aadhaar will not be mandatory for opening bank accounts might have an impact on aadhaar pay, a payment mechanism which enabled people. Supreme court upholds passing of aadhaar bill as money bill by lok sabha. Feb 07, 2019 linkage of pan with aadhaar is mandatory for filing itr. It has also laid down the services for which aadhaar card. Sep 26, 2018 a 5judge constitutional bench of the supreme court on wednesday upheld the constitutional validity of aadhaar scheme. The court s judgement means that private bodies like telecom companies, ecommerce firms, private banks and other such firms cannot ask for biometric and other data from consumers for their services.
The judgement of the supreme court on aadhaar on tuesday is important in many ways. Countering the government push to make aadhaar compulsory for access to social welfare schemes, the supreme court on tuesday said obtaining the 12. A quick summary of the supreme court majority order. Sep 26, 2018 the supreme court on wednesday ruled that the governments aadhaar scheme isconstitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including its linking with bank accounts, mobile phones. Secondly, it shifts a very important dimension of the case privacy to a higher legal level. After supreme court verdict, what needs to be linked with.
Aadhaar cant be mandatory for opening bank accounts or mobile phone connections, or for school admissions, rules supreme court. Linkage of pan with aadhaar is mandatory for filing itr. What is the aadhaar judgement of the supreme court about. For all the restrictions placed by indias supreme court on aadhaars scope, its too early. The supreme court today reserved its verdict on a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of aadhaar. The supreme court has made exception for children saying that no child can be denied benefits of any scheme if he or she doesnt have aadhaar card. Indias top court limits sweep of biometric id program. Here is a list of services where aadhaar linking is mandatory and where it is. Aadhaar linking not mandatory for bank accounts, phones. Full text of supreme court judgment on aadhaar india. Aadhaar not mandatory for bank accounts supreme court. Here is a list of services where aadhaar linking is. The court has restored the original intent of the programme. Supreme court rules aadhaar not mandatory for bank accounts, mobile numbers, school admissions justice a k sikri, who is part of the fivejudge bench ruling on the validity of the aadhaar act and who wrote the majority judgment, also struck down section 57 of aadhaar act, which permits private entities to avail of aadhaar data.
Most mandatory private use of aadhaar has been struck down. Supreme court upholds constitutional validity of aadhaar with. The supreme court wednesday declared the centres flagship aadhaar scheme as constitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including its. Aadhaar linking mandatory pan itr filing welfare schemes aadhaar. The longawaited supreme court judgement on the constitutional validity of aadhaar is finally out. Supreme court says aadhaar card is mandatory for getting a pan card, filing itr but not for mobile phone connections and bank accounts. This is what the supreme court did not like about aadhaar. The file can be downloaded in the zip format to save bandwidth. Download supreme court aadhaar judgement ministry of. Why indias supreme court allowed linking aadhaar with pan. The supreme court on wednesday ruled that the governments aadhaar scheme isconstitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including its linking with bank accounts, mobile phones.
I disagree with the judgement but intend to fully honor it. Heres a complete list of services where you need aadhaar card and where you dont need aadhaar card as per the supreme court judgement. This includes section 57 of the aadhaar act that permitted private entities to use the biometric authentication. The fivejudge bench led by chief justice of india dipak misra said the scheme gave dignity to the marginalised and served a much. What is aadhaar mandatory for and what is it not mandatory. Sep 26, 2018 much awaited aadhaar judgment is finally out. It has also laid down the services for which aadhaar card is mandatory read article. Download full text of supreme court judgment on aadhaar. Yesterday, the supreme court delivered its first verdict in a series of legal challenges that have been made against the aadhaar project.
What do you think about the supreme court judgement on aadhaar. The supreme court on wednesday ruled that the governments aadhaar scheme isconstitutionally valid but struck down some of its provisions including. Overview of the legal issues around aadhaar prsindia. Jun 09, 2017 supreme court of india on friday upheld the constitutional validity of section 9aa of income tax act which made mandatory linkage of it returns with aadhaar. The supreme court s aadhaar judgement has clarified the law on the services where the government cannot insist on the aadhaar card. The apex court s verdict will push up costs for the fintech industry, rajiv raj, the cofounder of creditscoring platform creditvidya told bloombergquint. Supreme courts judgement on aadhaar find out the impact on. Oct 01, 2018 the supreme courts verdict on indias aadhaar act, pronounced last week sept. The supreme court said the aadhaar fingerprint id system is legal, but restricted it to government benefits and banned companies from using it.
Thus, as per the latest judgement by the supreme court of india, it is not mandatory to link aadhaar card with existing bank accounts or to open new ones. Mar 27, 2017 countering the government push to make aadhaar compulsory for access to social welfare schemes, the supreme court on tuesday said obtaining the 12digit unique identification number, which. Mar, 2018 the supreme court is hearing a batch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of the aadhaar scheme on the touchstone of the fundamental right to privacy filed by former karnataka high court judge ks puttuswamy, magsaysay awardee shanta sinha, feminist researcher kalyani sen menon and others. Supreme court of india on friday upheld the constitutional validity of section 9aa of income tax act which made mandatory linkage of it returns with aadhaar. Supreme court verdict in aadhar validity case ntv youtube. Supreme court rules aadhaar not mandatory for bank accounts. Sikri, a fivemembered constitution bench of the supreme court said there is nothing in the aadhaar act that violates right to privacy of individual. Aadhaar valid but conditions apply, supreme court rules aadhaar means unique, and its better to be unique than being the best, the supreme court said today. In this article, we will discuss in detail about the key takeaways from the judgement on aadhaar. On day 12 of the hearing, the bench agreed, stating that while an absence of law could be supplemented in retrospect, a breach of law could not be validated in retrospect. The supreme court has also upheld section 9aa2 which requires that the aadhaar number must be intimated to the prescribed authority for the purpose of linking with pan. The judgment authored by justice ak sikri, which has concurrence of chief justice dipak misra and justice am khanwilkar, has read down some of the. The supreme court has finally pronounced the judgement on a bunch of petitions challenging the constitutional validity of aadhaar as 4. The aadhaar judgment has, at least for now, ensured that the pet project of two successive governments, has found sanctity in law.
Supreme court the court s direction came on an appeal filed by the centre against a delhi high court order allowing two persons to file itr for 201819 without linking their aadhaar and pan numbers. Supreme court says uidais aadhaar card is legal while the judgement means aadhaar is still mandatory for filing tax returns and to access welfare schemes, bank accounts dont. On september 26, 2018, a constitution bench of the supreme court, led by chief justice of india dipak misra upheld the validity of aadhaar but. Follow live updates on supreme court verdict on aadhaar.
1501 434 254 182 452 714 1215 949 1571 1641 308 205 241 156 492 358 331 975 754 1284 230 1168 69 332 137 925 639 230 370 1619 576 829 1400 30 236 1365 1114 429 571 694 432 545 410 1338 934 1223 838